Did the United States join with other world leaders to build a safe and altruistic organization? Only if your definition of safe and altruistic is akin to believing your mother is the tooth fairy.
Nope! The instigators of, first, the League of Nations and then the United Nations had no room for charitable instruments; the plan was to set up a governance system that would eventually be used to take control of the entire world. Alger Hiss, a known Russian spy who had been Director of the Carnegie Foundation and then the right-hand man for Franklin Delano Roosevelt, orchestrated the writing of the U.N. Charter. It was built by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (in concert with Hiss) and funded by the Rockefellers (and other globalists) to control the world—courts, weapons, economy, and even our minds. And it usurps our sovereignty.
With those travesties born at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1945, the CFR also gave us the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The IMF was set up to “control international exchange rates and to stabilize currencies.” President Franklin D. Roosevelt took us off the gold standard so a world currency could be established. Nixon signed an executive order declaring that the U.S. would redeem its paper dollars for gold—and the IMF would serve as the world’s central bank.
I ask again, why is the U.S. in the U.N.?
“The Council on Foreign Relations, established years after the Federal Reserve was created, worked to promote an internationalist agenda on behalf of the international banking elite. Where the Fed took control of money and debt, the CFR took control of the ideological foundations of such an empire—encompassing the corporate, banking, political, foreign policy, military, media, and academic elite of the nation into a generally cohesive overall worldview.” —Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope.
What’s happening? “In 1957, a congressional investigative committee revealed the following finding: In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisers to government, and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote ‘internationalism’ in a particular sense—a form directed toward ‘world government’ and a derogation of ‘American nationalism.’ The CFR has become, in essence, an agency of the United States government, and its productions are not objective but are directed overwhelmingly at promoting the globalist concept.”1
Why should the U.S. be out of the U.N.?
Sponsored by the CFR, Count Richard Nicholas von Coudenhove-Kalergi, considered the “father of the European Union,” argued for the dissolution of national borders and the promotion of mass allogeneic (genetically dissimilar) immigration.2 He also called for the “elimination of the Caucasian race for the sake of a superstate.”3
In rebuttal, Senator Pat McCarran, on immigration legislation he co-authored, stated:
“I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization, and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated, or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life but which, on the contrary, are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission, and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution to the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promoting this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.”
I could go on and on. I slid over the brainwashing, dumbing down, and corruption of our children in the schools through the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), a vile part of the U.N. set up to make youth into brain-dead, useful idiots. You can read more in my Cancel Culture articles and in many good books written in the past 10–20 years exposing the lies and schemes of the United Nations’ anti-American, anti-Western culture agendas.
As Tom DeWeese recently wrote: “The U.N. was wrong from its very beginning and is wrong now because it has always sought to interfere with national sovereignty rather than to provide a unique forum to help keep the peace.”
My question is now: Why aren’t we doing everything we can to get the U.S. out of the U.N.? That will solve most of the civilized world’s problems.
It’s time to slay the dragon.
Sources:
- Hearings before the Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations, House of Representatives, 83rd Congress., Second session on HP. Res. 217, Part 1, pages 1 to 943.
- Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Ein Leben fur Paneuropa pp. 28-32.
- Browne and Williams, The Killing of Uncle Sam, p.310