Submission by Kathleen Marquardt, American Policy Center

Okay, parents, how many of you have gone to your local city hall or county commission meeting and petitioned officials to work with you to remove schoolbooks until they are proven innocent of brainwashing your children?

Lopping off the head of the Department of Education in D.C. was a great token gesture, but it did nothing to remove the lies, brainwashing, and dumbing down of our children. That can only be done locally. That means YOU. It is time — past time, really — to get active in your local politics, all the way up to the state level. And NOW.

We have had so many generations of children raised through our schools that it is surprising there are as many red states as there are. It goes to show that our children still have the ability to think. But for how much longer under the AI revolution? We have decades of anti-human, anti-Christian, anti-reason indoctrination to undo — if it is even possible at this late stage. I believe it is, but we do not have long. And I AM NOT EXAGGERATING. Tempus fugit. We have wasted too much time and dumbed down too many children already.

As Publius Hulda so succinctly put it:

In a nutshell, the philosophy of our Founding Era, which was based on Reason and the recognition of God-ordained Fixed Principles, was taken away from us and replaced with the subjective philosophies of Pragmatism and Existentialism, both of which reject Reason and deny the existence of Objective Truth and Fixed Principles. These are now the prevailing dogma of our time, and unless we promptly repudiate them, we will fall.

Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay (authors of The Federalist Papers), along with others at the Federal Convention of 1787, were well educated and exquisitely knowledgeable in statecraft and political philosophy. They embraced the concepts of Objective Reality and Fixed Principles, knew logic, and could think. George Washington, a man renowned for his moral character — based on Christian principles — presided over the Convention.

In 2011, Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt wrote The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. She had worked in the Department of Education under Reagan and claimed to have found boxes of proof that our government was brainwashing children in the very schools we pay to educate them. As she said:

For generations, America produced innovators, inventors, and independent thinkers — people who challenged authority, built industries, and made this country the most powerful force in the world. But today? The average high school graduate can barely read at an eighth-grade level, lacks basic financial literacy, and has no clue how their own government works. This wasn’t an accident. It was designed.

Through a series of calculated decisions — removing civics, gutting traditional academics, replacing knowledge with indoctrination — they have deliberately dumbed us down. And the most infuriating part? We paid for our own destruction through taxpayer-funded education, massive teachers’ unions, and globalist influence over curriculum.

In previous articles on the education system being foisted on us through the unconstitutional Department of Education, I explained the BSTEP program.

Page 255 of BSTEP (page 288 of the PDF) contains a chart titled “Detailing the Controlling Elite.” The overview reads:

The Protestant Ethic will atrophy as more and more enjoy varied leisure and guaranteed sustenance. Work as the means and end of living will diminish in importance except for a few with exceptional motivation, drive, or aspiration. No major source of a sense of worth and dignity will replace the Protestant Ethic. Most people will tend to be hedonistic, and a dominant elite will provide “bread and circuses” to keep social dissension and disruption at a minimum.

Consequences:
A small elite will carry society’s burdens. The resulting impersonal manipulation of most people’s lifestyles will be softened by provisions for pleasure-seeking and guaranteed physical necessities. Participatory democracy in the American-ideal mold will largely disappear. The worth and dignity of individuals will be endangered on every hand. Only exceptional individuals will be able to maintain a sense of worth and dignity.

There is little doubt that environments do change. To recognize present and future environments, one must know the sources of change that create new environments. Technology is the major source of change. It opens up possibilities for manipulating, mastering, and transforming nature, resources, time, and space. It offers a systematic, disciplined approach to objectives, permits precision and measurement, and advances systems concepts that may be contrary to traditional religious, aesthetic, and intuitive modes. Because of technology, decision-making can be based on techniques such as simulation model construction, linear programming, and operations research.

(Note: The document also mentions that students deemed “worthless” for the New World Order would be provided drugs to keep them “comfortable.”)

Now that we have technocracy, all of this has been put on steroids. There is no need for drugs. They can go a step further than pseudo-sedation. They can accelerate the reduction of the human population — forget Planned Parenthood and abortions.

Curtis Yarvin and Nick Land formed the Neoreactionary Movement (NRx), often referred to as the Dark Enlightenment. It is an anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian, reactionary political philosophy that advocates a return to traditional, hierarchical, and autocratic forms of government, such as monarchism or corporate-style governance.

In a 2008 blog post on “Patchwork,” Yarvin wrote:

However, it helps us describe the problem we are trying to solve. Our goal, in short, is a humane alternative to genocide. That is, the ideal solution achieves the same result as mass murder — the removal of undesirable elements from society — but without any of the moral stigma. Perfection cannot be achieved on both counts, but we can get closer than most might think. The best humane alternative to genocide I can think of is not to liquidate the wards, either metaphorically or literally, but to virtualize them. A virtualized human is in permanent solitary confinement, waxed like a bee larva into a cell that is sealed except for emergencies. This would drive him insane, except that the cell contains an immersive virtual-reality interface that allows him to experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely imaginary world.

That is put bluntly. No one should wonder about Yarvin’s or Land’s intentions. But note: this is simply a modern-day method of achieving the ends that globalists have promoted for decades. One of the first things we were told needed to be done to “save the Earth” was to reduce the human population.

Well, here you have it. Those cared for under the Dark Enlightenment model would not be making babies or protesting their circumstances. They would be wards in a controlled existence until eliminated.

How many of you are married and thinking about having families in the future? Do you think your offspring would not be tagged for such a future? Are you part of the global elite?

If not, I would suggest it is time to open your eyes and begin standing up for sound science, reason, logic, compassion, and God.